Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Friday, January 23, 2009

Count Your Democratic Republic Blessings

This is very old news--like, November 21, 2008-old--but Spit Takes has been very busy over the last couple months and let this one sit and fester in her inbox. Apologies, particularly because this is a very sobering, important story.

Zargana, the Burmese comic I've mentioned before, was officially sentenced to 45 years in jail for his work helping the victims of Cyclone Nargis (!!). Here's the BBC:

Zarganar led a group of entertainers who organised private aid deliveries to victims of Cyclone Nargis, which hit in May.

An outspoken satirist of the military government, Zarganar had already been arrested and jailed four times before he was taken from his home again by the authorities in June.

At the time, he seemed to think the government would have no problem with his activities.

"No, we never encounter any problems, because we negotiated with them, and we just want to pass our donation parcels. We just want to encourage our people - this is our duty," he told the BBC in an interview just before his arrest.

He evidently violated the "Electronics Act," which regulates all electronic communications, by videotaping the destruction the cyclone left behind, and by criticizing the government in interviews with foreign media. The BBC's correspondent points out that such overreactions by the government in Myanmar--and of course this is just one of many--are "such breathtakingly disproportionate punishments" in order to "send two clear messages from the generals who rule Burma: that they will brook no opposition in the lead-up to their carefully managed transition to what they are calling a 'discipline-flourishing democracy;' and that they are unconcerned what the rest of the world thinks."

Of course, you can't be a county in this world now and not care what other countries think (hello? see where eight years of that got us?). Let's hope everything crashes and burns around them, and soon.

Ugh.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Comedy Crisis

Since the primaries really got dirty last spring and summer, the comedy world has been all in a dither about whether they will be able to make good jokes out of the Obama administration. As I mentioned on this blog previously, many digs about Obama are built on public perception of him, rather than him as a person. On the New York Times "Laugh Lines" blog today, the editor of About.com's political humor page (I know...About.com has a wha?) interviews various comedy writers about their next four to eight years.

MAD Magazine's guy's response is predictably threadbare and worn: "Why am I optimistic? Look who Obama has included in his inner circle — the Clintons! Talk about a humor stimulus package!" Ugh. Really? I'm not saying there aren't still details to be mined for comedy between Bill and Hillary, but come on. That's like making a joke about Hugh Grant and transvestite hookers or Milli Vanilli. STALE.

Baratunde Thurston, besides having the best name I've seen in months, is the web and politics editor for The Onion. I liked his take:
For the first few weeks, I plan to scream for joy and hug strangers on the street as I’ve done continuously since the night of Nov. 4. Then I plan to keep writing material that uniquely illuminates this country’s socio-political reality while causing laughter and self-urination among my audience. That’s what political comics do. Too many people had one Bush-is-dumb joke and thought that made them the next Mark Twain. The arrival of a president fluent in English should raise the bar.
Raising the bar is good, though I suppose hugging strangers on the street is not always the best course of action. Here is Peter Gwinn, a writer for The Colbert Report:
We do face a serious problem, because now that George Bush is no longer president, nothing is funny in the entire world. I expect that in 2009, most of my own comedy will consist of reading Laffy Taffy wrappers out loud: “Why are rhinos so wrinkly?” “Because they’re hard to iron.” That joke right there will always be comedy gold, at least until America elects a rhino president.
Another example of a good bad joke, thank you, Peter.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Follow-up: The Lockbox Strategery

Jokes and Positive Perceptions
I ran across some more news today that ties in directly with what I talked about in my last post. The Center for Media and Public Affairs, which has tracked late-night jokes made about presidential candidates since 1988, reported that from September 1, 2008 through last Friday, October 24, the Republican ticket has been the butt of 475 jokes, while the Democratic ticket was mocked only 69 times. That is nearly a 7:1 ratio (6.88:1, to be more precise), and is a thorough trouncing that no previous elections have come anywhere near.

This is, of course, reflective of the larger trend in benevolent comments about Barack Obama. Since the party conventions, evening news shows have been 65% positive. This is based on data from ABC World News Tonight, CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News and Fox Special Report. To McCain, the shows have only been 36% positive, and he (impressively?) falls behind even Sarah Palin's positive-comment percentage of 42%. (Evidently, Joe Biden gets talked about so little there isn't enough data for "meaningful analysis.")

As always, an addendum:
On Fox News Channel, by contrast, Obama's press has been only 28% positive during the general election, even worse than the 38% positive evaluations of McCain. Palin's coverage has been 49% positive on Fox, slightly higher than on the three networks.
Stay classy, Fox News. 

Punchlines Punching Back
Back in August, the CMPA released a list of the top joked-about public figures, and Obama was number four (behind W., Hillary Clinton, and John McCain, respectively). Jon Stewart told the most Obama jokes and Stephen Colbert told the most McCain ones, while Jay Leno joshed Hillary more than any other comics.  

Unfortunately, what this measurement doesn't weigh is what exactly about the candidate the comics make fun of. For example, Obama jokes in August were things like "The big story is Obama's world tour. Today, he made history by being the first man to travel around the world in a plane propelled by the media's flash photography." (Colbert) and "The tour may strike some a presumptuous. In fact, I joked that Obama would be stopping in Bethlehem to visit the manger where he was born." (Stewart). Those punchlines are built on public perception and veneration of Obama, not who he is as a person. This is a more accessible kind of humor for people of diverse political leanings, and funny in a both hey-that's-true and self-deprecation-of-the-media way. Nuanced! Of course, the ever-classy Leno writing room turned out one-note, candidate-specific gems like "Obama said he'll visit Iraq and Afghanistan because he wants to see an area overrun by violent extremists. So it sounds like he already misses his old church." Let's hope Conan takes all of his writers with him when he moves into that slot and doesn't have to inherit that kind of crap.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

The Lockbox Strategery

My, Spit Takes has been a busy girl! A month and no blogging action...I suppose I've just been caught up in election fever. Haven't we all? 

Well, the only thing the New York Times is more obsessed with than the election is coverage of and reaction TO the election. Hence today's article about how late-night comedy has seen a huge uptick in ratings and viewings recently. A run-down of some of their facts:
  • Ratings for SNL are up 50%
  • The Daily Show averaged 2 million viewers in September (that's huge for cable), and more viewers per episode than Conan
  • Number of internet viewings of the Tina Fey/Amy Poehler Palin-Couric sketch have surpassed the nearly 10 million people who watched it when it originally aired on 9/27
A big part of the success for SNL, of course, is the guest-starring of Tina Fey as Sarah Palin. A soon as Palin was announced, people started clamoring for Tina to take her on. We (and Seth Meyer's writers' room) are lucky she did. Another part of the success--for all programs, comedy and actual news--is that people really are paying attention. Seth points out, 
It's best for a writer when 70 million people see a debate...we did 11.5 minutes on that debate sketch last week [Sarah Palin/Joe Biden, with Tina Fey and Jason Sudeikis]. We couldn't do that if everybody hadn't watched it.
As far as the Daily Show and the Colbert Report go, they've been beating Leno, Conan, Dave, Craig, and Jimmy Kimmel in the coveted "men from 18-34" bracket pretty regularly...by several hundreds of thousands viewers per episode. Oof! In the big picture that is ratings, however, that isn't huge: the Daily Show averages 1.45 to 1.6 million viewers nightly, which is high for cable but nothing compared to, say, CSI's 18.6 million. However, in the big picture that is "the youth vote," however that might be defined, is spending more time listening to what Jon and Stephen have to say and less to the network boys. Conan puts it pretty well:
For some of the shows politics is their bread and butter. Shows like mine and Jay's and Dave's also do different things. Sometimes I have to move on to something silly, like me jumping in a vat of cheddar cheese.
I think Conan sells himself short. His impressions of Bush ("Uh-huuuuh?!") and Schwarzenegger ("Baargh!!") are some of the best out there. Though of course Conan + vat of anything = awesome.

So how much sway does Conan (or Jon, or Jay) have over public opinion? Since the Clinton years, presidential politics have started cropping up more and more in "nontraditional" media outlets, and people have been trying to parse the effects. An article published in the March 2004 Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media studied the influence of late-night comedy on the 2000 election, and it had some interesting points that still apply today. In regards to jokes made during the 2000 election, 
Among those subjects who did not watch late-night, Democrats rated Bush less knowledgeable over time and Republicans rated him more knowledgeable over time. But partisans who were high consumers of late-night appeared identical in the extent to which their ratings of Bush's knowledgeability changed from July to October.
Of course, comedy (at least, broadcast and mainstream sketch comedy) only really works if your viewer has knowledge of what you're joking about, as Seth mentioned earlier. Jon is quoted in this journal piece as pointing out that audiences need to "know something before [comedians can] even make a joke about it." This is what works so well with the Fey/Palin skits on SNL: many viewers have already glutted themselves on the ACTUAL ridiculousness of Palin's interviews and appearances, therefore they are familiar with the material. So when Fey repeats some lines verbatim, that is one kind of funny (sad funny, I suppose), and when she makes others up that are in the style of the actual quotes, that is a comedy of recognition.

With all that in mind, I'm not sure I'm convinced that our late-night friends actually have that much influence over public opinion. Let's conclude with what Lorne pointed out in the Times:
"I think we offer some perspective," Mr. Michaels said. "But when people start getting into how we're changing things, I think we're not. I think we affect the media and maybe influence some people. I think we're a safety valve. Some pressure gets let off by what we do."
Thoughts? Have you ever had your mind changed by a monologue, joke, or skit?

Friday, August 29, 2008

The Democratic Party: the Party of Comedy

Humor in politics is really interesting. For most politicians, it is generally a tool in a bag of tricks, an easy fix for something. John McCain can occasionally be funny in a chortle-y kind of way at times, and it serves to make him more...relatable? Or something. 

Of course, like with any piece of comedy, humor in politics can backfire on you. Let's look at a fictional example. The pilot episode of THE WEST WING follows (among other stories) the mini-saga of Josh Lyman almost getting sacked because he got into an argument with the Evangelical activist Mary Marsh during a TV debate. They are fighting about the presence of God in politics, and Mary says, "Well, I can tell you don't believe in any God I pray to, Mr. Lyman. Not any God I pray to." Josh pounces: "Lady, the God you pray to is too busy getting indicted for tax fraud!" Hi-larious! However, it's mean-funny, and that is a dangerous place to be.

The below scene is the final confrontation (and the first introduction of President Bartlet), wherein the agitated Mary Marsh and her cronies unleash their own bigoted brand of mean-funny, to similarly disastrous results. Josh keeps his head, but Toby, as per usual, has the most interesting reaction. He never crosses over into attack humor--he keeps on the defensive, but in such a biting way that it is really effective (i.e. the lug wrench line).



He's wrong about the Third Commandment, of course. The Third Commandment is "you shall not make yourself an idol," and frankly I'm baffled as to why Sorkin let that mistake slip by. Unless it was on purpose...in which case I don't have the energy to unpack everything that could be behind those intentions. Either, this is one of the many examples of why early WW is just so choice: this is the first episode, and we already know a ton about how all the characters process and react to humor in their line of work. 

But on to real life! The DNC this week has given us a couple good examples of well-oiled funny working its way into the speeches. What notable to me is not the presence of humor (that's not new) but the effortlessness with which our dear Dems have been approaching it. Gone is the scrambling of 2000, the nervous collar-tugging of 2004...the party has all the swoosh and confidence of someone who just lost fifteen pounds and bought a nice new pair of pants.  As a Democrat, I gotta say, it's a really wonderful feeling. I hope we use it well.

In another year, with darker clouds hanging over the future, perhaps the following jokes that I pulled out of keynote speeches wouldn't be so funny. But I'm just so optimistic about everything now, I'm giving everyone the benefit of the doubt!
  • After her (college-basketball-coach) brother Craig introduced her, Michelle Obama opened her speech on Monday the 25th with, "As you might imagine, for Barack, running for president is nothing compared to that first game of basketball with my brother Craig." Bad. Ass. Whachyou got, Cindy McCain?! Half-siblings that are voting for Obama,* that's what.
  • My girl Hillary had a nice, femme-friendly crack about her "sisterhood of the traveling pantsuit" in her speech on Tuesday the 26th. Not my bag, personally (I don't own a pantsuit** and I've never read that book), but it makes me happy to see a woman bonding with other women in a venue like that. 
  • Bill, that silver fox, also got a jab or two in during his keynote. Right off the bat, he dispelled any bad blood left over from the primary in one fell, punny swoop: "The campaign generated so much heat, it increased global warming!" He got a big laugh for that one.
  • In that vein, Mr. Al Gore had one of my favorite jokes of the week in his speech yesterday at Mile High Stadium. It's worth your fifteen minutes to watch his impassioned tirade (Daniel Dae Kim shows up at about 7:05!), even if just to be wistful about what could have happened...sigh. His joke: "John McCain, a man who has earned our respect on many levels, is now openly endorsing the policies of the Bush/Cheney White House and promising to actually continue them. The same policies? Those policies? All over again? Hey, I believe in recycling, but that's ridiculous." A rare case where "it's funny because it's true" applies. Of everyone in the whole world, you KNOW that Al effing Gore believes in recycling.
Obama and Biden mostly shied away from the direct humor to focus on portraying themselves as credulous and sincere as possible, which I quite understand. I really look forward to the debates, though; Barack is pretty damn fast on his feet with witty comebacks. And Sarah Palin, you'd better be able to bring it! Or at least pay Tina Fey to sit in for you.

Any other keynote jokes I missed? Thoughts on humor in politics? Bring it up in the comments!

* Ugh. Sorry. I promise that is the first and last time I ever link to Us Magazine.
** On the day I was elected as a county delegate for Hillary at my caucus, I was wearing my totally awesome Batman t-shirt.

Saturday, June 7, 2008

More Mood-Killing Political Humor!

In the June 2nd issue of The New Yorker, Lawrence Wright has a piece on the current fractious state of Al Qaeda, going back to its roots at Cairo University in 1968 with the group Al Jihad. It is absolutely worth a read, if only to humanize and make fallible the ideologues behind it all. The article focuses on the rift between two former cohorts, Ayman al-Zawahiri (Osama bin Laden's chief lieutenant) and Sayyid Imam al-Sharif (who goes by Dr. Fadl, and who authored two of the most influential books on modern jihad). It seems Fadl has come to believe that indiscriminate violence is not the most effective way to spread Islam, and has written a new book from prison in Egypt that renounces his old methods of jihad as ineffective and against the will of God.

Last May, Fadl sent a fax to the London branch of the Arabic newspaper Asharq Al Awsat briefly stating his new beliefs: "We are prohibited from committing aggression, even if the enemies of Islam do that...[t]here is a form of obedience that is greater than the obedience accorded to any leader, namely, obedience to God and His Messenger."

So why does this bit of news belong on my comedy blog? Because two months later, Zawahiri released a snarktastic video response, proving that even that even those with the most misanthropic view of life can somehow still be funny. "Do they now have fax machines in Egyptian jail cells?" he inquired. "I wonder if they're connected to the same line as the electric-shock machines."

How odd that Zawahiri, a man partly responsible for probably thousands of deaths, goes to sarcasm as his first line of defense. I guess unfettered, wild-eyed zealotism isn't something you can constantly sustain. And for me, it's particularly uncomfortable because that sounds like something Ben Karlin and his team would have come up with for Jon or Stephen. Comedy is a strange weapon, isn't it?

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Profile: Maung Thura

I've been aware of Burmese comedian Maung Thura (he goes by "Zargana," which means "tweezers") since 2006, when I read this article in the Washington Post about the oppression of comedians in Myanmar. Here's an excerpt from that article:

"Most of the jokes in our country satirize the government and its corrupt system so the authorities are afraid of our jokes," said Maung Thura, a dental student turned stand-up comic barred from the stage since May. "It is very difficult to perform nowadays. Most of the comedians are banned."

Myanmar's brand of humor would seem innocuous in most societies, like a joke now making the rounds that Maung Thura told about a chat by an Englishman, an American and a man from Myanmar, also known as Burma.

"Our man who had no legs could climb Mt. Everest," brags the Englishman, and the American shoots back, "Our man sailed across the Pacific with no hands." Then the Burmese chimes in: "That's nothing. Our country has been ruled for 18 years by a group of men who have no heads."

But such cracks are enough to land comedians among Myanmar's more than 1,100 political prisoners, according to the U.S.-based Human Rights Watch. The organization says the ruling junta "continues to ban virtually all opposition political activity and to persecute democracy and human rights activists."

The recent cyclone in Myanmar has been a severe test of this junta's unrelenting, bitchy chokehold on its citizens. Zargana has a track record of working on behalf of the people, from making films about HIV/AIDS awareness to speaking out in support of political uprisings. In the wake of Cyclone Nargis, he has been no different. Zargana has been working hard to provide relief to victims: he organized deliveries to outlying villages, to the tune of $6,500 worth of goods per day. This work has been financed by other entertainers and rich business professionals--essentially, people who can afford to help but are unwilling to deliver the aid themselves, for fear of government retribution.

Unfortunately, the donors were right to be hesitant. On Wednesday evening of this week, Zargana was arrested at his home in Yangon. The police trashed his house and seized a bunch of computer files ("they're in the computer?!"), including photos and videos of cyclone victims, as well as footage from the super-extravagant 2006 wedding of the daughter of the junta leader, Senior Gen. Than Shwe. Talk about a class gap. You can read more about it in this recent New York Times article.

Predictably, this is not the first time Zargana has been detained. In 1990, he was jailed for four and a half years, along with other such dangerous criminal minds as democracy advocate and Nobel Prize-winner Aung San Suu Kyi and two students each given 19-year sentences (!) for writing some questionable poetry. The closest American equivalent of locking Zargana up that I can think of would be the FBI arresting Lewis Black for volunteering at the 52nd Street Project (which he does, which is awesome). Pretty unthinkable. So what makes Zargana so dangerous?

Well, for one thing he prefers Benny Hill to Mr. Bean (zing). He is also an acclaimed film director, master of the political double entendres (who knew there was such a thing?) and accomplished satirist--essentially, Zargana is a Burmese Beppe Grillo. In this 2006 BBC news article, a reporter asks to hear some of his material:
"Ah," he said, almost apologetically, "I'm afraid Burmese jokes can be rather subtle and long".

But he told me one about a newspaper article. A man was reported to have died of an electric stock but everyone knew the paper was lying because the economy is in such a mess that most of the time the power is off.
I suppose if I were an uptight, insecure ruling junta, I'd want Zargana out of my hair, too. Isn't it impressive how relevant comedy can be when it is plopped into a pressure cooker? It's like watching the Daily Show when Jon is having a really "on" night. Except no one is going to break into Jon's Manhattan apartment and throw him in the clinker for showing a montage of clips proving Dick Cheney is a big squidgy liar.

So send positive, pie-in-the-face vibes out into the world for Maung Thura and his comedic compatriots. In that vein, let's close with some Aaron Sorkin-y inspiration, via that 2006 Washington Post article:

Even faced with a performance ban, Zargana seems resolute and brash. He speaks of a "whispering campaign" and insists under-the-table humor will persist in Myanmar's taxicabs, teashops and dining rooms.

"Burmese people love to laugh," he said. "But if I can't speak, jokes will still spread. The people will make them up themselves."